Reviewee vs. Reviewer: What's the Difference?
Edited by Harlon Moss || By Janet White || Updated on October 4, 2023
Reviewee vs. Reviewer: A "Reviewee" is the subject of a review, while a "Reviewer" is the individual conducting the review.
Key Differences
The words "Reviewee" and "Reviewer" both relate to the process of review, but their roles are polar opposites. A "Reviewee" is the one being evaluated, whereas the "Reviewer" is the person giving the evaluation.
In many professional settings, performance evaluations are common. The "Reviewee" is the employee whose work is being assessed, while the "Reviewer" is typically a manager or supervisor offering feedback on the "Reviewee's" performance.
Think about the publishing world. When a new book is released, the book becomes the "Reviewee" because it is being evaluated. The critic or journalist giving their opinion on the book plays the role of the "Reviewer".
Academic submissions, like research papers, also undergo review. Here, the "Reviewee" would be the author(s) of the paper, and the "Reviewer" would be the peer or expert examining the content, methodology, and findings of the paper.
In essence, while both the "Reviewee" and the "Reviewer" are integral to the review process, they sit on opposite sides of the evaluation spectrum. The "Reviewee" receives feedback, while the "Reviewer" provides it.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comparison Chart
Role in Review
Subject being reviewed.
Individual conducting the review.
Position in Feedback
Receives feedback.
Provides feedback.
Typical Scenarios
Employee evaluations, product assessments.
Book critiques, performance evaluations, academic reviews.
Interactivity
Often passive in the process.
Active in providing observations and comments.
Relationship
The one being evaluated or assessed.
The one giving the evaluation or assessment.
ADVERTISEMENT
Reviewee and Reviewer Definitions
Reviewee
The focal point of a critique.
This novel, as the Reviewee, received mixed reviews.
Reviewer
A person who evaluates or assesses something.
The Reviewer provided insightful comments.
Reviewee
An entity being studied for quality or standards.
The software, being the Reviewee, underwent rigorous testing.
Reviewer
A professional assessing the quality of an item or individual.
The Reviewer had years of experience in the tech industry.
Reviewee
An individual or item being examined.
The Reviewee waited anxiously for feedback.
Reviewer
An individual providing feedback on performance.
The Reviewer noted areas of improvement.
Reviewee
The subject of a performance assessment.
As the Reviewee, Jenna hoped for positive remarks.
Reviewer
An expert giving feedback on a particular field.
The film Reviewer praised the movie's storyline.
Reviewee
The recipient of evaluation feedback.
The Reviewee took the feedback constructively.
Reviewer
A critic offering their perspective on a subject.
As a Reviewer, he had a reputation for being fair.
Reviewee
One who undergoes a review.
Encourage the reviewee to do most of the talking.
Reviewer
One who reviews, especially one who writes reviews, as for a newspaper or magazine.
Reviewer
A person who writes reviews for a newspaper or other publication; a critic.
Reviewer
An inspector.
Reviewer
One who reviews or reëxamines; an inspector; one who examines publications critically, and publishes his opinion upon their merits; a professional critic of books.
Reviewer
Someone who reads manuscripts and judges their suitability for publication
Reviewer
A writer who reports and analyzes events of the day
FAQs
Is a Reviewee always a person?
No, a "Reviewee" can be a person, product, service, or any subject of review.
Who initiates the review process, the Reviewee or Reviewer?
Typically, the "Reviewer" initiates the review process, while the "Reviewee" is the subject.
Do all Reviewers have expertise in what they review?
Ideally, a "Reviewer" should have expertise, but this isn't always the case, especially with general consumer reviews.
Is the role of the Reviewer always neutral?
A "Reviewer" should be unbiased, but personal preferences can sometimes influence reviews.
Can one person be both a Reviewee and a Reviewer?
Yes, in different scenarios or contexts, one can be both.
Can a Reviewee disagree with the Reviewer's feedback?
Yes, a "Reviewee" can provide counter-feedback or clarifications to the "Reviewer's" comments.
Which is more stressful, being a Reviewee or a Reviewer?
It's subjective. Being a "Reviewee" can be stressful due to scrutiny, while a "Reviewer" may face pressure to be fair and accurate.
Are all reviews formal?
No, reviews can be formal (like in professional settings) or informal (like casual product reviews).
Are there cases where a Reviewee chooses their Reviewer?
Yes, in some instances, like choosing an editor for a book.
How should a Reviewee react to negative feedback?
A "Reviewee" should be receptive, consider the feedback constructively, and use it for improvement.
How can a Reviewee prepare for a review?
A "Reviewee" can prepare by understanding the criteria, gathering relevant information, and being open to feedback.
Does a Reviewer always have the final say?
Not always. Some review processes allow for dialogue and mutual understanding.
Can a Reviewer's feedback be challenged?
Yes, feedback can be discussed, and clarifications can be sought.
Who benefits more from the review, the Reviewee or the Reviewer?
Both can benefit. "Reviewees" get feedback for improvement, and "Reviewers" refine their evaluation skills.
Do Reviewees always seek reviews?
Not always. Sometimes reviews are mandatory or unsolicited.
Can a Reviewer decline to review?
Yes, if they feel they lack the expertise or are biased in some way.
How important is the relationship between the Reviewee and Reviewer?
A good relationship can foster constructive feedback and understanding, but reviews should remain objective regardless.
Can a Reviewer be anonymous?
Yes, some platforms allow "Reviewers" to provide feedback anonymously.
Is feedback from the Reviewer always negative?
No, "Reviewers" can provide both positive and negative feedback based on their assessment.
What qualities should a good Reviewer possess?
Objectivity, expertise in the subject, clear communication, and fairness.
About Author
Written by
Janet WhiteJanet White has been an esteemed writer and blogger for Difference Wiki. Holding a Master's degree in Science and Medical Journalism from the prestigious Boston University, she has consistently demonstrated her expertise and passion for her field. When she's not immersed in her work, Janet relishes her time exercising, delving into a good book, and cherishing moments with friends and family.
Edited by
Harlon MossHarlon is a seasoned quality moderator and accomplished content writer for Difference Wiki. An alumnus of the prestigious University of California, he earned his degree in Computer Science. Leveraging his academic background, Harlon brings a meticulous and informed perspective to his work, ensuring content accuracy and excellence.
